a. Develop, document, and disseminate to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles]: 1. [Selection (one or more): organization-level; mission/business process-level; system-level] assessment, authorization, and monitoring policy that: (a) Addresses purpose, scope, roles, responsibilities, management commitment, coordination among organizational entities, and compliance; and (b) Is consistent with applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and 2. Procedures to facilitate the implementation of the assessment, authorization, and monitoring policy and the associated assessment, authorization, and monitoring controls; b. Designate an [Assignment: organization-defined official] to manage the development, documentation, and dissemination of the assessment, authorization, and monitoring policy and procedures; and c. Review and update the current assessment, authorization, and monitoring: 1. Policy [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and following [Assignment: organization-defined events]; and 2. Procedures [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and following [Assignment: organization-defined events].
| ID | Name | Description | D3FEND | |
| CM0088 | Organizational Policy | Documented cybersecurity policies establish the foundational governance framework that defines how an organization protects its information assets, assigns security responsibilities, and ensures consistent security behavior across all personnel and organizational levels. For space mission organizations, these policies must address the unique threat environment, operational constraints, and asset types associated with spacecraft, ground systems, and mission data, providing a coherent governance layer that connects organizational security objectives to the technical controls and operational practices implemented throughout the mission lifecycle. Well-documented policies ensure that personnel at all levels, from executive leadership through program management to operations staff, understand their security roles and responsibilities, reducing the probability of security failures attributable to ambiguity, inconsistency, or lack of guidance. Policies establish organizational security objectives, authorities, responsibilities, and required outcomes. Risk assessments, system requirements, standards, plans, and procedures translate those policies into technical controls and operational practices. During a security incident, approved incident response plans and procedures provide the actionable guidance needed to implement organizational policy and support timely decision-making. Mission organizations must identify the legal, regulatory, contractual, policy, and licensing requirements applicable to their activities and ensure that their cybersecurity policies address those obligations. Documented policies may therefore serve both organizational governance and compliance purposes. | ||
| ID | Description | |
| SPARTA ID | Requirement | Rationale/Additional Guidance/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| SPR-367 | The [organization] shall develop and document program-specific security assessment and authorization policies and procedures.{SV-DCO-1}{CA-1} | Structured A&A policies formalize evaluation processes. Defined methodologies ensure consistent risk evaluation. Clear authorization boundaries prevent ambiguity. Governance strengthens mission trust. |
| SPR-368 | The [organization] shall have policies that clearly describe the processes and methodologies for conducting security assessments, obtaining authorizations, and performing continuous monitoring activities.{SV-DCO-1}{CA-1} | Explicit procedural guidance reduces inconsistency. Defined methodologies improve repeatability. Continuous monitoring integrates assessment into operations. Governance ensures sustained oversight. |
| SPR-526 | The [organization] shall tie go/no‑go authorizations to verified artifacts (flatsat/twin results, signed images, key ceremonies) and define how authorization boundaries adjust under contingency conditions; evidence shall be captured for A&A.{SV-MA-6,SV-SP-9}{CA-1,PL-2,CM-3} | Flight decisions must rely on validated artifacts. Evidence capture strengthens compliance. Contingency adjustments must remain controlled. Governance alignment supports mission safety. |
| ID | Name | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|